Women solicitors believe flexible working damages career
Many women solicitors believe their careers will be damaged if they take up more flexible working arrangements, a large-scale study has revealed.
A survey of 800 women solicitors conducted by King’s College London together with the Association of Women Solicitors (AWS) found that half of women lawyers considered that solicitors who took up flexible working were ‘viewed as less serious about their careers’.
The study found a very high level of job satisfaction among women solicitors, with 80% saying they experienced ‘real enjoyment’ in their jobs, and more than three-quarters saying they were ‘deeply committed’ to their work. However, half of those questioned felt they worked ‘too many hours a week’, with 41% working more than 48 hours both in the office and at home. Some 96% of women lawyers said they wanted a career that allowed them to integrate their work with their personal and family life.
One in three women solicitors were dissatisfied with their opportunities to work flexibly, with senior associates, associates and assistants more likely to be dissatisfied than partners or women in senior professional support roles. Half of those surveyed said they felt lawyers who made use of flexible working were viewed as less serious about their careers, and 44% said flexible working had a negative impact on promotion prospects. Women lawyers who made use of flexible working arrangements were less satisfied with their careers and perceived significantly fewer opportunities for promotion, as well as more job insecurity.
Around 40% of respondents were currently using some kind of flexible working arrangement, with 28% working reduced hours, although 40% of these women still felt they were working too many hours a week.
Survey author professor Janet Walsh said: ‘There is a perception among some women solicitors that law firms pay lip service to work-life policies… If law firms wish to avoid higher levels of burnout and dissatisfaction they need to look carefully at the issue of women’s career progression.’
Meanwhile, the new AWS chairwoman Christl Hughes, a family law partner at Leicestershire firm Barlows, told the Gazette this week that women solicitors in the provinces face more ‘outdated sexist attitudes’ than their City colleagues, including a belief among clients that ‘solicitors should be men’. Hughes said she would be supporting women lawyers in smaller firms outside the big cities during her tenure.


Comments
it's not just women that this affects
Why is it that discussion about flexbile working often seems to center on issues that women have with it?
There are plenty of male solicitors who'd quite like to work flexibly but don't get the option. I'm one of them!
At the end of the day we're all part of the same profession and focusing on our gender, ethnic group or sexual orientation as an issue sets up arbitrary and artificial divides.
what's far more important is that the younger generations (under 40's) aren't going to make the same kind of money as they current crop of partners and we know it, so we have a conflict between the culture of presenteeism for eventual reward which is favoured by the current firm owners, versus those of us who can see the writing on the wall for the profession and just want to do a decent day's work for a decent day's pay in reasonable conditions and BTW be paid for the time we actually work! no more unpaid overtime!
What is the problem?
My firm, as many know, has always worked flexibly and I think it right to say there have never been any problems caused by this.
Professionals know when they need to get things done and don't need to be told. If firms are worried they can't trust their lawyers to do this, they shouldn't be employing them. That said, will law firms employing really good divorce lawyers please keep being totally inflexible??!! I ask as we have taken on 6 new divorce lawyers recently partly due to this outdated approach.
Our experience is lawyers don’t mind working long hours – what they mind is being tied to a desk, expected to conform to a macho approach which says they must work late and having no flexibility to take time when they need it, for children’s sports day, or just to have time off when they’re not so busy. Lawyers who are respected and trusted in this way and who have proper rest are much happier.
It is important not to forget this virtuous circle: happy lawyers = happy clients!
missing the point
Is it just me, or is this article missing the point? I don't see this as "women solicitors believe flexible working damages their career" the article is about how women solicitors see the the perception of those who opt for a flexible working regime as somehow being "less serious" than those who do not and surely that is what needs to change. Flexible working does not damage a career - outdated attitudes and an employer's inability to embrace it does - let's focus on the truth and call this article "The Legal Profession's inability to offer flexible working is damaging the career prospects of incredibly talented lawyers"
Latest report on women and maternity leave
This is an interesting point. I also read this report today from The Ladders...
Over the past few months at TheLadders.co.uk we have been conducting a study to find out which gender is better at job interviews and the results have been eye-opening. We found that women overwhelmingly outperform men in interviews, however this does not guarantee job success, as the fear of maternity can be the ultimate barrier in securing a top role.
Women and maternity leave
Frankly, flexible working should damage your career. I work over 90 hours a week and have done for as long as I can remember. I would expect to be treated somewhat better than someone who places a higher value on their domestic life and who takes time off to deal with having a family. I am a woman. I am fed up with the bleating from part time womens
I totally agree with Andrew
I totally agree with Andrew Wooley's comments and anon at 13.03. I find it astonishing that some employers treat the solicitors they select and employ to handle cases that require a high degree of responsibility with such mistrust. BTW, someone needs to remind Anonymous at 17:59 that we work to live not the other way round!