Zurich to cut new PII business ‘significantly’
One of the top three solicitors’ professional indemnity insurers will ‘significantly’ cut the number of new law firms it takes on this year, the Gazette can reveal.
Zurich, which had a 13% share of the solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance (PII) market last year, said that it has decided to ‘significantly reduce capacity for new business’ this year because it needs to control its exposure to the assigned risks pool (ARP).
The news will come as a blow to more than 3,000 law firms and sole practitioners who may need to find alternative cover during the coming renewals season because of the expected departure of Quinn from the market, and an announcement by Hiscox that it is pulling out of solicitors’ PII altogether. Zurich covers the full range of the profession, from sole practitioners to international firms.
Market sources indicated that there are no new insurers presently seeking to enter the solicitors’ PII market.
Zurich legal professions manager Jenny Screech said: ‘We have a significantly reduced capacity for new business because we need to control our exposure to the ARP. We have been engaged with actuaries for a number of weeks, trying to work out what our involvement will be this year. We need to very carefully control our capacity, and we will have a much reduced capacity.’ The reduced capacity relates to new business rather than renewals for existing customers.
Screech declined to comment directly on which types of firm are most likely to be affected by Zurich’s decision, but said: ‘The difficulty for the profession is going to be the one- two- and three-partner firms. It’s unfortunate that there isn’t a market solution for the problems this year. If we had been able to achieve some change this year, the profession would have been looking at a very different scenario now.’
Meanwhile, the Solicitors Regulation Authority has announced a tough new enforcement programme aimed at firms in the ARP that have not paid their premiums. It said these firms will face regulatory sanctions, court action, and/or an intervention, and those that have not paid their ARP premium by October will be closed down.
The Law Society welcomed the action. President Linda Lee said it ‘should reduce the costs of the ARP, which are ultimately borne by the profession, help to create a more affordable solicitors’ PII market and improve protection for the public’. She added: ‘The Society has been calling for a more rigorous management of the ARP for sometime and we will be providing extra funding to enable the SRA to implement the new measures effectively.’
The ARP is the insurer of last resort for firms that cannot obtain insurance on the open market. It charges punitively high premiums, which many ARP firms fail to pay. As at 14 June, £4.5m of ARP premium was due for the 2008/09 indemnity year, and only £2m had been paid. Claims against ARP firms in that year are estimated at £41m.
The shortfall in premiums and the cost of claims is paid for by insurers in proportion to their share of the solicitors’ PII market.


Comments
Uninsured Profession
'If we had been able to achieve some change this year, the profession would have been looking at a very different scenario now.’
Is Mr Screech saying that the SRA's failure to act on the APR will result in solicitors being unable to obtain insurance? That is how I read it.
Well done ex-solicitor! It is
Well done ex-solicitor! It is very easy to see why you left this profession!
Your post earlier in the week referring to the assigned risks pool as the APR.
And now referring to someone called Jenny as a Mr?
I suppose it is rookie errors like yours that are increasing my premium!
Oh and the APR!
thanks for making me spill my
thanks for making me spill my coffee laughing.
Dont Panic Mr Mainwaring !!!!!!
SRA will be in full panic mode soon - Nearly 3000 ex Quinn firms are going to have serious difficulties finding affordable PII this year - ARP is going to expand enormoursly.
A large proportion wont be able to pay the premiums - umm - mass interventions and closures - How will the SRA cope - are they really going to enforce closure & bankruptcy on such a large propotion of the profession ?
And for the rest of the profession - expect massive hikes in premiums - This years market is going to be very hard indeed for small to medium sized firms.
Other than QBE, XL and
Other than QBE, XL and Travellers, are there any other insurers that will quote for small firms (i.e. 1,2 & 3 partner firms)?
APR or APR
Now I know some-one reads my comments!
i was a lawyer not a trypist - can you tell what it is yet?
SRA – Spineless Regulatory Authority
The SRA knows full well which firms have caused huge problems within the ARP. They’ve had their heads well and truly buried in the sand and have failed to act for years.
Insurers who have been burdened with unsustainable minimum terms have been crying out for change and only now with no ‘White Knight’ on the horizon is the SRA prepared to do anything about it.
Unfortunately, it’s a case of too little too late and will be a very painful year for the majority of firms especially those 3,000 firms affected by the Quinn debacle…. and that’s another story….
Looks like the many will be paying for the few....again….wasn’t that the same scenario 10 years ago!!!
I blame those pesky BME firms
I blame those pesky BME firms we are hearing so much about lately