- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Thursday 19 July 2012 by James Parry
The Gazette drew attention to the increase in the extent of the ‘victim surcharge’ which is soon to be imposed on those who receive custodial sentences.
It is unclear how the government proposes to extract payment from the impecunious defendant who receives a prison sentence. If it is proposed that a consecutive period of imprisonment will be imposed in default, the cost of enforcing that default will outweigh any benefit.
Of course it may be that no thought was given as to how these surcharges are to be collected; with the result that the scheme will only appear credible because of the increased charges paid by long-suffering motorists and television-licence defaulters.
James Parry, Parry Welch Lacey, Huyton, Liverpool
- Law firms: information overload?
- A sad day for the legal profession
- Barmy PCT model
- Welsh office
- Legal reforms: call for consistency
- Malaysian abuses
- Dog-eat-dog profession
- Divorce advice
- Civil strife
- Family arbitration: award show
- Job centred
- Tendering: grim precedent
- Law Society Yacht Club
- SRA must level the playing field between corporations and law firms
- Minding our language
- PCT: dumbing down
- Family scheme: the right choice