• The Law Society
  • Gazette Jobs
  • The Gazette
  • CPD Centre
  • Bookshop
  • Events
  • Library Online
Skip to Navigation'
The Law Gazette
Privacy and cookies

Panel cull

Thursday 02 August 2012 by Stanley Jacobs

I have today (24 July) received an email advising me that I have been removed from Santander’s conveyancing panel with immediate effect due to very few instructions. However, on 1 February 2012, I paid £118.80 to Santander as the fee for its annual panel membership review.

Santander has failed to return any part of that fee. Is there a case for unjust enrichment, as I expected to be on the panel at least until the next annual review?

Stanley Jacobs, solicitor, London N3

Subscribe to the daily email news update from Gazette Online Subscribe to the daily email news update from Gazette Online
  • Printer-friendly version
Linkedin Group Join our group Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter Facebook Group Like our page

Letters

  • Law firms: information overload?
  • A sad day for the legal profession
  • Barmy PCT model
  • Welsh office
  • Legal reforms: call for consistency
  • Malaysian abuses
  • Dog-eat-dog profession
  • Divorce advice
  • Civil strife
  • Family arbitration: award show
  • Job centred
  • Tendering: grim precedent
  • Law Society Yacht Club
  • SRA must level the playing field between corporations and law firms
  • Minding our language
  • PCT: dumbing down
  • Family scheme: the right choice
  • Home
  • News
    • News archive
    • Obiter
    • Lawyer in the news
  • In Practice
    • Law reports
    • Practice advice Q&A
    • Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal
  • In Business
  • Features
    • Book reviews
    • Charity Explorer
    • Supplements
  • Opinion
    • Letters
  • Blogs
    • News blog
    • In Business blog
    • Euro blog
    • Newsletter sign up
    • RSS feeds
    • Social media
  • Moving On
    • Submit move
  • Jobs
  • Supplements
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Charity Explorer