Soundbite propaganda
It would be helpful if those who believe they are entitled to instruct others on policy paid attention to their own words. Dr Peter Swinyard - no doubt an esteemed professional - being one such individual (‘Top GP backs checks on whiplash claims’).
Dr Swinyard appears blithely unaware of the implications of his words when he says that, while he always wants to believe his patients, ‘you sometimes have a hunch things are not as they seem’. There is a certain irony in a doctor’s ‘hunch’ being a determinant of policy, when at the core of the debate on the reality (or otherwise) of whiplash injury is the medical expert’s preparedness to endorse injury when there is no ‘objective evidence’ to prove it - at least so Jack Straw MP frequently tells us.
Policy arising from such soundbite propagandising will result in as many flaws and unintended consequences as the existing mess causes.
John Holtom, managing partner, Legal Solutions Partnership, Luton
Letters
- Plans underline PCT failings
- Don’t access all areas
- Chris Grayling: divide and rule
- Shortcomings of mediation
- PI claims barrier
- Working in the law: starting over
- Courts: the US should be a warning
- Alternative to PCT
- Consumer help
- Consumer help
- RTA ‘industry’
- Professions and industrial workers - vital distinction
- Criminal limit concerns
- Blair's lord chancellor reforms ruining constitution
- Cocts management: unintended consequences
- Grayling’s legal aid ignorance
- Legal aid: the right to choose
- Spelling bee
- Civil legal aid: an attack on those in need

