Report comment

Yet another example of unconscionable cheek by the fourth estate. I'd almost go as far as to suggest their counsel should have been reprimanded for accepting their instructions to argue the point.

Can we all now say that there's a public interest in our bringing our cases because they help determine what the law is?

I still haven't got over the preposterous fact that it's (rightly) an offence for public officials to take bribes from the press to give information, but if it is even still an offence to pay them, circumstances no longer seem to exist where anybody will ever again get convicted of paying them.