Report comment

A very sensible and reasoned decision. Can't think of anybody much better than BWQC to have taken up the case for the Claimant side of things and can't think of a firm I'd rather see on the losing end that Horwich Farrelly. Frankly, I am sick and tired of having to spend considerable time arguing down their and a few other firms' deliberately selective interpretation of the rules.

In terms of the Government quickly stepping in...It would be overtly perverse - even I dare say too much so for this Government - if Defendant Part 36 offer makers in fixed cost cases were granted indemnity costs upon obtaining a favourable Judgement vis-a-vis their offer but a Claimant in the exact same situation did not...