<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?><rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
 <title>Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decisions </title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>David Colin Bellchamber</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/david-colin-bellchamber</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11064-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1975
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 11 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 26 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found that there was no case to answer on the allegations against the respondent and dismissed the case. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/david-colin-bellchamber&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71397 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nicola Campbell</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/nicola-campbell</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11079-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1990
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 21 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 16 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/nicola-campbell&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71396 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>David Rudolph Heinrich</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/david-rudolph-heinrich</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10988-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1994
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 25, 26 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 17 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/david-rudolph-heinrich&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71394 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nicholas Peter Mark Sweeney</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/nicholas-peter-mark-sweeney</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10620-2010
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1989
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearings 19, 20 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 25 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for 12 months to commence on 20 March 2013. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/nicholas-peter-mark-sweeney&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71387 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Nisar Ahmad</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/nisar-ahmad</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11058-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 2006
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 7 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 26 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/nisar-ahmad&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 09:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71385 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Asif Akbar Swati</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/asif-akbar-swati</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11022-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 2006
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 7 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 17 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for an indefinite period to commence on 7 March 2013. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/asif-akbar-swati&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71257 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ahmed Iqba and Forziya Kolia</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/ahmed-iqba-and-forziya-kolia</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10857-2011
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 27, 28 February 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 19 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1999) should pay a fine of £15,000; and that the second respondent (admitted 2002) should be prohibited from having her name restored to the roll except by order of the SDT. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/ahmed-iqba-and-forziya-kolia&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71256 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Vivian Wilson Cowle</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/vivian-wilson-cowle</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11053-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1973
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 6 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 24 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be reprimanded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/vivian-wilson-cowle&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71255 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Penelope Joy Baker and Ivan Tze Yeen Tan</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/penelope-joy-baker-and-ivan-tze-yeen-tan</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11051-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 9 April 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 22 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1998) and the second respondent (admitted 1999) should each pay a fine of £1,000. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/penelope-joy-baker-and-ivan-tze-yeen-tan&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71254 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Charles Elwes Dunbar</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/charles-elwes-dunbar</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11055-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1983
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 5 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 15 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/charles-elwes-dunbar&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 14:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71241 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Michael Robert Smith</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/michael-robert-smith-0</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11033-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 10 January 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 19 February 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the applicant’s application for the determination of the indefinite suspension from practice imposed on him (see case 10137- 2008) should be refused. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/michael-robert-smith-0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 16:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71163 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Julian Peter William Fallows and Harry Hodgkinson</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/julian-peter-william-fallows-and-harry-hodgkinson</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Applications 10662-2010, 10876-2011
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 19 February 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 20 March 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1995) should pay a fine of £2,500. Contrary to rule 20.05 of the Solicitors Code of Conduct 2007, the first respondent had failed to deal with the SRA in an open, prompt and co-operative way. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/julian-peter-william-fallows-and-harry-hodgkinson&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71162 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John Rhys Davies</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/john-rhys-davies-0</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10086-2008
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1977
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 26, 27 February 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 27 March 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/john-rhys-davies-0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71161 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>David Michael Layard Horsfall</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/david-michael-layard-horsfall-0</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11031-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1981
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 13 February 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 3 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/david-michael-layard-horsfall-0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71159 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Howard Robert Gillespie Young</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/howard-robert-gillespie-young-0</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10661-2010
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1995
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 14 March 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 22 April 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/howard-robert-gillespie-young-0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 15:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">71015 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Raymond John Ridley</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/raymond-john-ridley</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11023-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1979
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 13 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 15 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/raymond-john-ridley&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70929 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sellathamby Sriskandarajah</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/sellathamby-sriskandarajah</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11039-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1988
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 17 January 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 5 February 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £5,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/sellathamby-sriskandarajah&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 15:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70866 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ian Allison Victor Pratchett, Matthew Apau Obeng and Arindum Das</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/ian-allison-victor-pratchett-matthew-apau-obeng-and-arindum-das</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10958-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 11 February 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 27 March 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1999) should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for five years to commence on 11 February 2013. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/ian-allison-victor-pratchett-matthew-apau-obeng-and-arindum-das&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 16:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70821 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clive Miller Hindle, Nicola Jane Carroll, Eileen Crawford Wilson, Gary Ackinclose</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/clive-miller-hindle-nicola-jane-carroll-eileen-crawford-wilson-gary-ackinc</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10767-2011
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 11 June 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 27 July 2012&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the allegations made against the first and fourth respondents should be adjourned and severed, but that the hearing of the allegations against the second respondent (admitted 2002) and the third respondent (admitted 1993) should proceed. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/clive-miller-hindle-nicola-jane-carroll-eileen-crawford-wilson-gary-ackinc&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70820 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Neale Simmons</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/neale-simmons</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11017-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1988
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 11 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 21 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/neale-simmons&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70819 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Denise Alexia Baker</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/denise-alexia-baker</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11021-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1997
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 19 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 14 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be reprimanded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/denise-alexia-baker&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 15:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70818 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Marlan Higgins</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/marlan-higgins</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11020-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 2002
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 13 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 15 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be suspended from practice as a solicitor for an indefinite period to commence on 13 December 2012. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/marlan-higgins&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70800 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Boon Low</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/boon-low-1</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10913-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 2004
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 13 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 4 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/boon-low-1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 14:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70799 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>John Roberts, Geoffrey John Cogan, John David Martyn Loney, Peter Michael Higgins and Philip Bradley Roberts</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/john-roberts-geoffrey-john-cogan-john-david-martyn-loney-peter-michael-hig</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11008-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 8 January 2013
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 4 February 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the first respondent (admitted 1973) should pay a fine of £4,000; that the second respondent (admitted 1979) should pay a fine of £2,000; and that the third respondent (admitted 1978) should pay a fine of £2,000. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/john-roberts-geoffrey-john-cogan-john-david-martyn-loney-peter-michael-hig&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 13:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70729 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dennis Akhole Ebhogiaye</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/dennis-akhole-ebhogiaye</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11000-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 11 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 23 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/dennis-akhole-ebhogiaye&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70718 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Salina Seeparsand</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/salina-seeparsand</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11044-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 2005
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 11 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 21 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/salina-seeparsand&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70717 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Andrew Kennedy Horsey</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/andrew-kennedy-horsey</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10948-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1971
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 6 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 4 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be struck off the roll. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/andrew-kennedy-horsey&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70716 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Anthony David Simpson</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/anthony-david-simpson</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10987-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 10 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 15 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/anthony-david-simpson&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70715 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wing Hing Howard Chan</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/wing-hing-howard-chan-0</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 11005-2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 1991
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 12 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 10 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should be reprimanded. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/wing-hing-howard-chan-0&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70714 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Milan Patel</title>
 <link>http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/milan-patel</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Application 10905-2011
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Admitted 2005
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Hearing 14 June, 23 October and 11 December 2012
&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reasons 8 January 2013&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SDT ordered that the respondent should pay a fine of £15,000. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/in-practice/sdt-decisions/milan-patel&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/law-gazette-category/in-practice/sdt-decisions-0">SDT decisions</category>
 <category domain="http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/category/subject-area/professional-negligence">Professional negligence</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmaher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">70630 at http://www.lawgazette.co.uk</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Page cached by Boost @ 2013-06-19 17:00:14, expires @ 2013-06-19 18:00:14 -->
