Anonymous#CommentAvatarLabel Commented on: 2019-05-10T11:00:02.937
This really just makes a bad situation even worse, particularly given how Respondent-friendly most Employment Tribunals are!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report comment
Vote up0 Vote down0
Peter Maynard#CommentAvatarLabel Commented on: 2019-05-08T15:01:46.050
But of course if a solicitor had delayed this long in refunding sums due to an innocent party, then they would be up before the SDT and ritual disembowelling would then be considered far too lenient.
Can someone please pass the sauce for the goose?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report comment
Vote up0 Vote down0
Anonymous#CommentAvatarLabel Commented on: 2019-05-08T14:12:39.830
Can’t we get the SRA to sort this out and levy fines for incompetence where appropriate?
Unsuitable or offensive? Report comment
Vote up0 Vote down0
Anonymous#CommentAvatarLabel Commented on: 2019-05-08T13:12:00.440
How about some interest being paid by HMCS
Unsuitable or offensive? Report comment
Vote up0 Vote down0
Anonymous#CommentAvatarLabel Commented on: 2019-05-08T12:59:55.887
I still want to know what is being done to make sure that a Defendant who settled the claim gets a chance - without relying on the Claimant - to say "That's our money, we settled for a global sum which included the fee".
Unsuitable or offensive? Report comment
Vote up0 Vote down0
Anonymous#CommentAvatarLabel Commented on: 2019-05-08T12:40:31.023
Now that is 'Disgraceful'!
Unsuitable or offensive? Report comment
Vote up0 Vote down0