Report comment

Let's just hope Mrs. Young does not now turn on her lawyers, of if she does that they are well, very well, insured.

Judges should also realise that parties to such a case are not interested in financial reason, just in stretching their erstwhile loved ones on the rack of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973 . It's a sort of Spanish Inquisition of the 21st century. And it would seem Mr. Young more or less forced her to do so by his un-cooperative (pace Rev. Flowers though you seem to have hidden a thing or two) behaviour.

And by the way who are we to say how the rich, or anyone else for that matter, should spend, nay waste, their money? It's theirs after all to do what they want with. When will couples with one marriage and two children be told not to bother with wills, just rely on the AEA 1925 as amended?