Report comment

Anon. 08.49 "however, the lack of evidence is a commercially sensitive thing. ombating fraud is all about intelligence, if that intelligence is disclosed it becomes worthless.

I know some claimant firms who have been privy to that sort of intelligence and they now finally accept that there is an issue."

These comments are intriguing.

There are repeated requests for evidence to back up Insurers' assertions and these are usually ignored.

Would it be possible for a respected body of Claimant lawyers and robust statisticians to be appointed to see the "evidence" confidentially and assess just what it does show? Perhaps this would provide some reassurance to Claimant Solicitors? Or undermine Insurers' assertions?