Report comment

It is known that some lawyers work only for money and they can't argue some sensitive issues. Litigants in person are required in this society to avoid further wastage of public funds and justice to families should be given. I don't think that legal representation should be made compulsory. If judges listen to LIPs without prejudice, this will save more time and money. But in most family cases, judges favour parties with legal representation or public authorities who hire counsels from reputed firms. In this circumstance, the LIPs in family cases are prejudiced, discriminated and unheard.