Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

Hi there all. I refer to the subject in which am ecro was ordered against a LIP. It would be interesting to know how that was achieved. Banning someone his access to justice in British Courts is of a teasonous character, because it implies that the basis for it was invalid in the first place. Judiciary must give reasons for a gcro or an ecro. There is also a hearing with them. If the judge cannot give a principled reason using the facts and law of the case then he is not acting in a judicial capacity and he should be subject to proceedings against him. My suspicion is that the arguments agreed by the judge when the case should have been set aside were also invalid. My experience shows that many judicial decisions are also unmeritorious because it is unlawful to give a decision without adequate reasons. This brings me to void process. The Courts appear to ignore stare decisis when it comes to process which lacks validity. I am afraid our judicial system does not to me, administer the law in the name of Parliament and the state.

Your details

Cancel