Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

I think that I am just too simplistic and straightforward and when I took a 'tick box' approach to Litigation, the Letter of Claim read:

1. You had a Duty to set up my Mother's Estate in a Tax efficient manner as shown by the Letters that went between you.

2. You failed that Duty by taking IHT out of the Estate on every Asett and every penny my Mother had.

3. As the main Residual Beneficiaries we suffered a loss because of you failure of Duty to set up the Estate in a Tax Efficient manner.

4. A huge loss also occurred because of your failure to Safeguard my Mother's Investments and her money was just thrown into a falling Stockmarket although she had a Low Risk Profile.

I then itemised a list of the SRA Code of Conduct Breaches although I note that the "Should not act in a Conflict of Interests Situation" has now become something like: do your best for both Clients!

I don't know why but I was just ignored...though I note that someone has been extremely busy co-authoring a Book on Powers of Attorney. Let's have a glass of Sherry on it ...now what age is it ...and is that how you spell Sherry but never mind soon Claims from Beneficiaries will be a thing of the past.

And although it is now over a year later, I still haven't had a response from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors as to why the Building Survey Report I had carried out bore no resemblance to a Building Survey Report and quite literally left me knee deep in effluence and many other problems. But who cares about people like me anyway.

Your details

Cancel