Report comment

There were several comments on two other articles on this site -

(a) querying whether there had been an unlawful data breach resulting in the provision (by whom was not identified) of client names to either of these firms (knowingly or unknowingly on their part was not stated), and

(b) asserting that claimants had been cold called (which, if true, might be a problem in respect of cases handled by Mr Green's firm but, depending on the facts, may or may not be for Mr Carlisle).

The fact that claimants have emerged 2 years after their cases were settled, and in some cases where there has been no deduction from their damages, lends some support to the concerns expressed.

Can Messrs Green and Carlisle put all our minds at rest please by specifically responding to these two points - and at the same time telling us how they in fact do (a) acquire and (b) contact claimants.

But please don't expect to us to accept that it is purely a triumph of search engine optimisation, as that would not explain the point about cases where there is a 2 year delay.