Report comment

A quick scan of Bailii brings up these 3 cases;

Hanley v JC & A Solicitors Ltd [2017] EWHC B28 (Costs) (19 December 2017),
Green & Ors v SGI Legal LLP [2017] EWHC B27 (Costs) (18 December 2017)
and
Parvez v Mooney Everett Solicitors Ltd [2018] EWHC 62 (QB) (19 January 2018)

Are there any more?

Lots more it seems; the SCCO is full of them and try as you like to delay them, Mr Green, they will tick away in the background for a very long time - gathering adverse costs and interest on these

The adverse costs on the above, alone, must be stiff enough

And this is before any sanctions for alleged cold calling, maybe failing to have audience rights, a suggestion of maybe not having a practising certificate, purported prof con issues and questions as to retainer / funding issues etc

How is Mr Green / Mr Carlisle going to pay for all of this mess if, as looks like, the "moderately inventive" business model collapses along with the practices of Mr Green and CMLF / Deep Blue?

Appeal counsel and lost appeal adverse costs don't come cheap