Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

Anon 12.33 MdR fell foul of s 61 of the TA 1925 which affects solicitors and their use of their clients' money and couldn't get relief from its sanction. The appeal will clarify that. As such they were liable.

Mr Hall. Please give chapter and verse and name names.

To the point I've just looked at this judgment again. There is nothing in it to support what you suggest. To the contrary the judge exonerated one set of solicitors and absolved MdR of negligence. Hardly "a good kicking". Liability was statutory.

Your details

Cancel