Report comment

Someone anonymously commented below that without CMCs there would be no work.

Really?

Well, I'm busier than ever, and I don't do any work via CMCs, never had, never would. I have never paid a referral fee, and find that practice repugnant.

I don't use medical agencies either - other than reputable ones where the payment terms are extended to help the client, and my office. I get no kick backs, wouldn't entertain the idea, and don't think that's a widespread thing that's done in any event.

I'm afraid the anonymous poster seems to think that the sins of the VERY few should be accounted by the many.

We've had all sorts of nonsense to put up with - ludicrous reforms, slashed costs, budgeting, sanctions, hikes of court fees by 620% against the judiciary telling us that claims are too expensive, and then constantly, constantly, having to battle against changes predicated for the insurance industry.

This is not a job for the faint hearted, there are many who are fighting to survive - the suggestion of back-handers and nefarious dealings are the stuff of absolute fantasy. Quite often the stories are predicated by, or on behalf of insurers, and then repeated over and over.

I sat in the Strangers Gallery at the House of Lords yesterday, listening to the second reading of the Civil Liability Bill. There were some utterly clueless 'Daily Mail' observations peddled, but, thankfully, some really sensible, thoughtful contributions from Lord Mackay, Baron Monks, and the absolutely on point Baroness Berridge - counsel with a PI background.

When you listen to debate on this subject, carefully ask yourself first whether the person who pontificates has any experience in the PI field. Then sit back and listen to those with 20, 30, or 40 years or more experience in the field, and try to get a balanced, rather than partisan view.

I act for Claimants and Defendants alike, and have for 34 years now. It would be foolish to suggest that the proposed reforms are 'necessary' or proportionate. There is, without doubt, a very clear insurance driven focus, and I am afraid I find the way that PI has gone, and is heading, extremely concerning.

I thought law was about advancing the rights of a party, whoever that party appears to be, not kneecapping them.