Report comment

My, lay, view of this is that I would be unlikely to engage Ms Popal, because she seems not to have realised that she was opening the can of worms that the multitude of comments show was immediately recognisable to traders. Her only way of showing herself in a good light is the, I think unlikely, one of now providing the full facts. I also think there'll be something dubious about the 'accused' solicitor if he doesn't do the same. There'll be no breach of confidentiality as the client won't be named. If I were the client and had one of the wholly rational and, therefore, non-racist reasons for my choice, I would find it amusing, again remaining anon, to throw my oar into your professional sea.