Report comment

Just so I am clear, the BSB considers that it is appropriate to name the sender, but not the recipient?

I am puzzled as to why the recipient, who therefore will have been in possession of the cocaine, and indeed likely a willing party to the transaction, is able to move on without so much as a mention. If they were not a willing participant, doubtless they are able to issue a statement accordingly.

Closing ranks, as BSB appears to do here, is not likely to likely promote trust in the profession now is it?