Report comment

Ironical that on a thread about freedom of speech so few are prepared to put their names to their comments. As regards the Anon who objected to anyone objecting to Andrew Finkel's remarks, I imagine the reason for the widespread disapproval was that Mr Finkel's position points towards the criminalization of thought, as in the days of Bluff King Hal and certain 20th century totalitarians. I agree with Ian Newbery.