Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

Para 18.1 of the SRA judgment is interesting:

"Mr Wearing confirmed that his witness statement was true to best of his knowledge and belief. He had been the COLP to whom the Third Respondent had spoken to at the firm she joined after leaving the Firm in 2014. In cross-examination he confirmed that contrary to his witness statement, the Third Respondent had passed her probationary period and had only been dismissed due to risk management issues
relating to possible proceedings before the Tribunal."

So, is Mr Wearing being investigated by the SRA for submitting an untruthful witness statement to the SRA as part of its investigation?

Your details

Cancel