Report comment

Does anyone else remember the obiter describing a well known insurer's practice as 'somewhere between sharp practice and outright fraud' (and yes I know the J was overturned on appeal).

We need to drum out the dishonest charlatans in the claimant PI side of things, of that there is little dispute and as far as I can see no one standing up for either the grossly inflated credit hire claims, selling ATEs at £350 so as to obtain commissions: what we are saying is that we should distinguish the proper conduct of work of the profession and the improper presentation by those presenting an argument with no evidence.