Report comment

"In its explanation of the case, the Supreme Court says the issue is whether a claimant must prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the former missed claim would have been an honest one"

The answer to that must surely be yes? Obviously, this is an over-simplification, but even so, one can see the re-birth of 'cannibalism' and gaudy CMC marketing in this arena if the decision goes a certain way.