Report comment

This article seems to say that work is being “ done” (i.e only now: present tense ) about claimants getting medical reports...so from this, can we guess that they haven't properly sorted this aspect out already ? ...in the same way that the actual IT side hasnt been sorted ? Like what happenss with claims where liability is in dispute hasnt been sorted ? What about other expert evidence ( e.g engineering evidence) ....put another way ...apart from give claimants a kicking ...has anything coherent that might actually be “ fit for purpose” been sorted out ? ....