It worries me deeply that legal aid and private fee rates are seldom debated. Many practitioners carry out legal aid work at rates between, say, £30-£50 an hour. However, when a client does not qualify for legal aid, how does the same practitioner justify charging private rates of closer to £150 for the same service?

Many legal aid practitioners claim to be ‘caring’ and ‘helping the most vulnerable of society’, yet the moment a client fails to qualify for legal aid, there is no support for them. I have a client who is not on a high wage. He has failed the legal aid means test by earning a couple of pounds a week over the threshold.

The same firms which were prepared to accept £40 an hour from the government are now demanding £150 an hour from him, in full knowledge that he won’t be able to afford it.

How does one justify this? I could go further and argue that a private client is worthy of lower fee rates, just so that the solicitor does not have to communicate with the Legal Aid Agency and its cumbersome procedures.

Ravi Sethi, Manchester

 

 

 

Topics