Hundreds of protesters accused of expressing support for the banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action will be interested in a hearing at the Supreme Court next month.
On 16 September, the High Court delivered its ruling in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys, which examined who is authorised to conduct litigation on behalf of clients.
The SRA is less cocksure than it was, but boardroom flux may also have contributed to this week’s emollient noises on the future of the client account.
Conservatives court controversy with attacks on judicial independence
2025-10-08T12:05:00+01:00By John Hyde
Robert Jenrick led the attacks on 'activist' judges this week. He really should know better.
ECHR: 'Mamma Mia, here we go again'
2025-10-06T10:51:00+01:00By Jonathan Goldsmith
Arguments about leaving the European Convention on Human Rights have become the focus of political attention once more.
Does terror act interfere with human rights?
2025-10-05T18:39:00+01:00By Joshua Rozenberg
Hundreds of protesters accused of expressing support for the banned terrorist organisation Palestine Action will be interested in a hearing at the Supreme Court next month.
Best of the blogs - 4 Oct 2025
2025-10-04T11:46:00+01:00
Missed our blogs this week? Here’s our top five…
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys: What solicitors need to know
2025-10-03T15:14:00+01:00By Law Society president Richard Atkinson
On 16 September, the High Court delivered its ruling in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys, which examined who is authorised to conduct litigation on behalf of clients.
Mazur blues
2025-10-02T18:37:00+01:00By John Hyde
Julia Mazur may not know it, but her name will have been spoken about in virtually every law firm in England and Wales since last week.
Law firm hits back at accusations of profiting from Mazur
By John Hyde
Leaked webinar reveals CILEX members were misled pre-Mazur
By John Hyde
We lawyers need to be vigilant against ‘fake law’
2025-10-02T08:51:00+01:00
Runnymede Trust’s recent analysis finds that the word ‘illegal’ remains the number one term associated with ‘immigrants’ in public discourse.
What the High Court’s Mazur ruling means for non-qualified staff
2025-10-01T10:28:00+01:00By Vicky Lankester
Court rules that unqualified law firm employees cannot conduct litigation – so what is next for high-volume litigation law firms?
Does mass litigation really harm the economy?
2025-09-30T06:19:00+01:00By Beverley Robertson
Claims that group claims cost the country £18 billion do not stand up to scrutiny.
Holding back the AI waves
26 September 2025By Jonathan Goldsmith
Protests are being staged outside offices in San Francisco and London, asking tech companies to stop their race to develop ever more powerful AI.
Mother in Law: Lessons in basic financial hygiene
26 September 2025By Anonymous
Diary of a busy practitioner, juggling work and family somewhere in England.
Money troubles
2025-09-26T08:44:00+01:00By Paul Rogerson
The SRA is less cocksure than it was, but boardroom flux may also have contributed to this week’s emollient noises on the future of the client account.
Workplace culture – respecting junior lawyers
2025-09-24T05:21:00+01:00By Nusrat Siddique
In recent years, the regulatory lens has shifted.
The criminal justice system matters, yet its very future is in peril
2025-09-24T05:05:00+01:00By Law Society president Richard Atkinson
With huge court backlogs and prisons at breaking point, the very future of our criminal justice system is in peril.
Client money in a mess
2025-09-22T10:41:00+01:00By Jonathan Goldsmith
Public policy is all over the place, with different public authorities moving in different directions.
David Lammy ‘back on his old beat’
2025-09-22T09:42:00+01:00By Joshua Rozenberg
If Lammy was concerned about being demoted, there was no sign of it during his first Commons appearance as justice secretary.
Best of the blogs - 20 Sep 2025
2025-09-20T07:34:00+01:00
Missed our blogs this week? Here’s our top five…
Bordering on farce
2025-09-19T09:22:00+01:00By Paul Rogerson
The Law Society of Scotland has the Holyrood legislature just where it wants it.
The importance of lay voices in judicial appointments
2025-09-18T15:07:00+01:00By Judicial Appointments Commission
You don’t need legal expertise to play a vital role in shaping the future of the judiciary.
Legal sunshine in the gloom
2025-09-18T07:20:00+01:00By Jonathan Goldsmith
Some things are going right, at least for a section of the UK legal profession and for the UK overall.
All comment and opinion