Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

Anon 12.26 yes and this judgment now negates FD. It was designed to fight fraud and exaggerated claims, if someone else now picks up those costs who has no control of the claimant's conduct, it encourages more fraud. It also negates settlement and encourages more trials to go ahead on spurious grounds, see the article last week on APIL's comments.

Your details

Cancel