Report comment

Agreed anon at 2.05pm
Divorce financial issues involving say foreign assets and numerous substantial pensions would bear no resemblance to a matter where the only real asset is the fmh. As such the comparison between fixed fees and hourly rates is meaningless. The hourly rates lot may well have had far more complicated matters and hence there possibly charging an hourly rate given potential difficulties in agreeing a fixed fees at the outset where the extent of the complexities might not be clear