Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

Sorry I must beg to differ.

Former Law Society Litigation Chair James Perry has said the following:

“ So many questions, so few answers, so much concern! Yesterday's House of Lords session with our Master of the Rolls cleared up little. The attached last question made me sit up though, which for those that know I've done my back in, was met with a yelp! This clip is attached.

Questions still with no answers:

1. When and how will litigants be channelled towards AI?
2. Will opportunities for lawyers diminish if this triage approach is adopted?
3. Will lawyers they do use to help be legal aid litigators or not?
4. Will that system help litigants or not? I personally hate Chatbots!
5. Will we see any useful statistical evidence to back up some of these assertions?
6. Will it be black box, white box or grey box AI?
7. Will it be HITL or AITL or Agentic AI?
8. Will it be pre-processing, in-the-loop, parallel feedback, or post-processing?
9. What will the learning paradigm be? Supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, active learning, IML, machine teaching, reinforcement learning?
10. Will it be confidence-based routing, explainable AI, multi-agent or MBSE?
11. How will the LLM not eat itself?
12. Do the decision makers even understand the above lingo? “

Your details

Cancel