Report comment

Given the endemic issue of fraud, which will impact adversely on the firm taking on such claims, this must be a good thing - if it is reliable and produces meaningful reports. A number of clients have talked of the 'false negatives' they get from a number of electronic AML checks. Most still seem to find the electronic checks more useful than not and have learnt how to differentiate between major red flags, and potential false alerts. Does anyone have more information about exactly how this will operate in practice?