Report comment

But it's not a partial win. It's a win. And if the claimant obtains her damages she should obtain 100% of costs.

It's no more ridiculous than someone obtaining a judgement, of 1% against one of say two defendants in a case being permitted to enforce 100% of that judgement against the 1% defendant.

I agree that it was Wolf started all this. My memory is that he was the one who introduced the concept of" issue-based costs". Barking. But I'd have him back in an instant if it meant that I'd still have a job at the end of the year