Report comment

Rayner please stop being obtuse.

My client's Part 36 (i.e. claimant Part 36 offer) was accepted by the defendant immediately prior to trial. The offer had been made around 15 months prior.

When liability is denied 'seeking admissions' is kinda over and done with. I don't really follow your comments about assessment as these seem to be made under a false premise.

For the rest you simply confirm your lack of understanding. dear "Registrar, please provide an opinion Consultant X's treatment of my client." Somehow I don't think that will work.

GPs may comment on breach of duty by GPs, nurses of nurses and paramedics of paramedics and so on, but none of those will comment on causation.

Your way, you'd end up with extra medical evidence for which cost would be not recovered and your client would have to pay for it. Advising that course of action is negligent.

I'll leave you to your nonsense now. Go do the work and let us know of your successes.