Report comment

Maybe the Government's Sir Oliver will produce the MoJ's 'undoubted' evidence from the courts of the documented frauds from the increase in PI claims over the last 10 years?

With his implication that 50% of the 10 year doubling of claims are due to frauds, he confirms an awfully poor standards of the courts not to Holt such apparently widespread criminality?

The FOI is being prepared today!

The courts usually follow the evidence and match or measure any liability of a party using the standards confirmed in law?

Surely, such an obvious level of fraud would have drastically increased awards for fundamental dishonesty? Not sure why such decisions remain so very rare?

This is especially so given Sir Oliver' undoubtable reliance upon facts well known to him and the insurer victims of such massive frauds?

As regulated Firms, all insurers are required to make 'durable medium' reports to the FCA detailing the evidenced facts of fraud to meet the insurers' absolute obligations to operate to protect consumers and the Financial Services Markets!

So WTF was done say 8 years ago when Sir Oliver' evidence would have identified such drastic increases in frauds? Could it have been a result of the improvements Parliament for consumers to access justice so there was less state and taxpayer money used for injured and vulnerable folks injured through no fault of their own, now apparently known as fraudsters by Sir Oliver?