Report comment

The SRA already has a publication policy in relation to their decisions. Surely bearing in mind this is following one of their so called investigation, there is no need to add a further layer of publication? How would this proposal help the public? There is already so much information on the internet available to those inclined to look for it. My view is that the SRA should look at their own transparency and when they publish decisions , publish the name of the decision maker. They should put their own house in order first. As for pricing, people do their research and negotiate so it is kind of blah, as proposals go. The SRA should get on with regulating and stop trying to make headlines.