Report comment

Mr Carlisle - now that we have enjoyed lunch:-


1. You hold a directorship of a corporate entity, you have declared a significant level of control over that corporate entity;

2. That entity has one person being regulated and authorized to conduct costs litigation/enjoying limited rights of audience within the meaning of the LSA 2007; and that person is registered with the Costs Lawyers Standards Broad at that corporate entity;

3. That regulated and authorized person is an employee of the corporate entity you enjoy that directorship over;

4. Is it, therefore, the case that when you appear in open court on behalf of a member of the public for reward, that regulated and authorized person, (being an employee of the corporate entity of which you are a director with a declared significant control), employs you to conduct litigation, and to address the court on behalf of members of the public for reward.

Am I right, therefore, that despite holding a directorship of a non-regulated corporate entity, the regulated and authorized employee of the same corporate entity gives employment to you?

Who is the paymaster and who is the servant?

Please clarify from where you derive the rights to practice or conduct reserved legal activities: this is a fundamental point of any lawyers practice - even yours.

A good deal of the persons reading these articles will have rights of audience and the right to conduct reserved legal activities within the courts of England and Wales.

I am sure none of them would object if they were asked to confirm the origin of those rights, or not as the case may be.

If you cannot reply properly or if you are continually coy as to your right to conduct reserved legal activities - begs a series of questions of the utmost gravity.