Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

I agree with the general consensus that this decision is not only patently right, but that it is evidence that the system we already have, is designed with sufficient checks and balances to deal with this type of behavior; therefore reform may not be (is not) necessary.

However I also agree that the system is slightly skewed in the manner in which Claimants are dealt with when it comes to dishonesty.

I have in practice faced many a low velocity impact Defence that just can't be true; where the damage to the cars suggests quite a wallop but the D insists that they weren't injured so the C can't have been.

There needs to be a system to deter defendants from running spurious liability and LVI defences as some of the ones I have seen are so obviously the construction of the insurer and not the insured

Your details

Cancel