Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.


Essentially this is saying that the size of the trial bundle is more important than the relevance of the evidence it contains. Is it beyond the judge to read the witness statements before trial and disallow anything that is not relevant, rather than applying an arbitrary evidence cap. How long before we see trial directions which state that the evidence which can be adduced at trial is limited to three soundbites per party!

Your details