Report comment

I have been watching this debate with interest, but confess I'm still baffled by the basic provision In the second paragraph of the article where it refers to the consultation response and which mentions that: " . . .freelance solicitors . . . will be required to have in place adequate and appropriate indemnity cover." and then goes on to say: "They will have to explain to potential clients they are not covered by minimum terms and conditions of professional indemnity insurance."

Is it just me or the second part about explaining to clients that you don't have in place minimum standards of indemnity cover directly in conflict with the first part that says you have to have it ?!