Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

Some good points David below. However:


1. I am not sure how far a firm would consider that it is not possible to bring a claim to an ET where a lawyer has said their evidenced is a sham in view of the many times that witnesses 'do not come up to scratch' .

2. And of course outside Counsel is often only retained after the event and they are unlikely to say that evidence is a sham even when they do get on board.

3. And does a firm really feel itself in conflict with Professional Ethics? Particularly a large firm. I am as honest as the day is long, the longer the daylight the less I do wrong as Suggs to quote ….

4. Have you ever known an individual lawyer go against their partnership / firm? !

5. Smearing employees uis done all the time after the event and when a large discrimiation clainm crystillises in front of a firm's eyes... Being baout to be hung concentrates the mind wonderfully soemone once said.

Your details

Cancel