Report comment

QUES : Are practitioners in genuine and serious ill-health or over a financial barrel seriously expected by the regulator to be in a position to defend themselves as fully as the potential gravity of the outcome can often merit? ANSWER : NO THEY ARE NOT.
QUES 2: is it proper for the regulator to pursue significant disciplinary action to the fullest in the knowledge of those circumstances? ANSWER: NO absolutely not, that is discrimination to start with and is indeed unlawful if the long term illness of a practitioner was not taken into consideration, before you rip him or her of their livelihood. New legislation needs to come in at the earliest for practitioners who were suffering from long term illnesses at the time disciplinary action was taken against them.