Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

"According to papers presented to the LSB board, those contacting the tribunal have continued to be more litigious, for example including threats of judicial review and naming the tribunal as an interested party in judicial reviews."

Is it too much to ask that those who fund the SDT (and the SRA) be allowed to read these "papers"? Why would threatening a JR of the SDT (or threatening to name it as an interested party) necessitate any significant increase in the SDT's budget? Does the SRA's projected increase in prosecutions assume that the SDT is about to lower the standard of proof?

Your details

Cancel