Report comment

I have come across, far too often, cases where the costs budgets have been significantly slashed mid-way in, with the approach taken to make such a decision being that this is what would be reasonable in a case of 'x' value. I wonder how a claimant can be represented in the best possible way when simplistic approaches like this are taken.

The whole process is very time consuming and means even more time and costs will be spent if something substantial changes in a case that means an application is required to have the budget revised, with the costs risk that the application may be unsuccessful.