Judicial review sought for unfair dismissal cap

Topics: Employment,Courts business

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

Related images

  • Alex Monaco
  • Jonathan Goldsmith

A newly introduced cap of one year’s salary for compensation for unfair dismissal is to face a High Court challenge.  

London employment firm Compromise Agreements said this week it is seeking a judicial review of the cap, which came into force on 29 July under the Unfair Dismissal (Variation of the Limit of Compensatory Award) Order 2013.   

Advertisement

Today the High Court is also expected to hear the final part of a judicial review brought by trade union Unison, challenging the government’s introduction of employment tribunal fees. The court is expected to make a decision this month.

Barrister Alex Monaco, founder of Compromise Agreements, said the cap on compensation will disproportionately affect older people, as they are most likely to receive more than a year’s salary due to difficulty in finding another job.

Monaco (pictured) said this could cost the government more in benefits payments.   

Previously the cap was for three years and a maximum of £74,200. ‘However, it was rare for anyone to receive more than two years,’ said Monaco.

Older people on low incomes are unlikely to be able to find representation under the changes, as the compensation would be too small, he said.

Compromise Agreements applied for the review after failing to get assistance from other parties, Monaco said. ‘Despite being employment lawyers, rather than public law or JR specialists, it became clear that if we didn’t do it, no one would, and we felt it our public duty to act.’

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comment
  • Save

Theresa may

Sharia law review panel named by home secretary

26 May 2016By

Leading family solicitor to explore whether application of Islamic law is compatible with that of England and Wales. 

Family court/Court of Protection

Councils face greater DoLS duties

26 May 2016By

Law Commission publishes initial conclusions from its review on deprivation of liberty scheme.

Neil buckley

No case for ban on paid McKenzie friends – regulators

26 May 2016By

LSB and SRA agree there is not enough evidence of consumer detriment to support judges’ proposed ban.

Advertisement

Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession

Legal Services

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition