Ruling takes foreign lawyers further on passage to India

Wednesday, 22 February 2012 India’s much-vaunted ‘road map’ for the liberalisation of its £2.6bn legal services market has inched closer to reality following a high court ruling in a case concerning magic circle and international firms. In a ruling yesterday, the Chennai high court gave foreign firms the right to practise in India on a ‘fly-in, fly-out’ basis wh... More news...
Chennai high court

In Practice

Simon Allen

Violent employees and vicarious liability

Thursday, 16 February 2012 In recent times a disproportionate number of cases concerning vicarious liability have reached the higher courts. Sadly, a number of these have involved abuse of children by members of the clergy. Violence is a common feature, though financial wrongdoing was the offence in Dubai Aluminium Company Ltd v Salaam [2003] AC366. The House of ... More In Practice...

In Business

What do solicitors need to know about acting for Chinese clients?

Cracking the Chinese market

Thursday, 16 February 2012 At the UN Security Council, Britain and China publicly disagreed on policy towards Syria. But elsewhere the Year of the Dragon has brought a distinct thaw in Britain and China’s once cool relationship. Chancellor George Osborne returned triumphant from his recent visit to Asia, having secured an agreement that the City of London will become the o... More In Business...

More news:

Ombudsman confirms move into claims management

Tuesday, 21 February 2012 Plans for the Legal Ombudsman to handle complaints about claims management companies will benefit consumers and the legal profession, accord...

DLA’s fixed-price venture chases commercial market

Monday, 20 February 2012 A fixed-price legal services provider today became the first new entrant of the alternative business structure era to enter the commercial m...

In March 1995, Judge David Bentley QC sitting in Sheffield Crown Court was forced to make a public apology after stating that a defendant did not need to ‘stoop so low’ as to employ the services of a solicitor-advocate. The idea that a member of the judiciary could publicly state such a view is now anathema, and rightly so. The legal landscape has shifted dramatically since 1995. Changes to public funding, rights of audience and regulation mean that the traditional distinction of the barrister in court and the solicitor behind the scenes preparing the papers is far removed from reality.