Wi-Fi providers not liable for users’ copyright infringement – top EU lawyer

Topics: IT and intellectual property,Courts business

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (2)
  • Save

Related images

  • Wi fi

The advocate general of the European Court of Justice has advised the court that the owners of shops, hotels or bars providing free Wi-Fi for the public should not be liable for copyright infringements committed by users.

It follows a case concerning Tobias McFadden, who operates a business selling and renting sound systems, and which also offers public Wi-Fi access. A regional court in Munich ruled that he was ‘indirectly liable’ after music became unlawfully available for downloading in 2010 via that internet connection. 

Advertisement

But in an opinion, which is likely to signal the line the European court will take, advocate general Maciej Szpunar said those who provide free Wi-Fi access as a supplement to their main business activities should have limited liability over unlawful acts committed by a third party.

He said this limitation would preclude them from orders for payments of damagers, or to pay costs relating to copyright infringements covered by third parties.

But he said that the limitation would not shield providers from injunctions, which if they did not comply with they could be fined for.

But he said that injunctions would have to be effective, aimed at bringing a specific infringement to an end, and must fairly balance between rights of freedom of expression and freedom to conduct business with intellectual property rights.

Szpunar also said that the injunction should not be issued if the only way to comply with it would be by ending the connection, password protecting it, or monitoring all communications transmitted through it.

He said: ‘Any general obligation to make access to a Wi-Fi network secure, as a means of protecting copyright on the internet, could be a disadvantage to society as a whole and one that could outweigh the potential benefits for rights holders.'

A final judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union will be delivered at a later date.  

Readers' comments (2)

  • 'Szpunar also said that the injunction should not be issued if the only way to comply with it would be by ending the connection, password protecting it, or monitoring all communications transmitted through it.'

    - ie. impossible!

    LB

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • This kind of action, even though the ECJ is likely to follow the opinion, has a dampening effect on commerce. Free WIFI is now pretty common in the UK but even the threat of action could well cause businesses to stop offering it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (2)
  • Save

Karl turner

Former shadow attorney general sorry for failing to declare interest

30 June 2016By

Complaints made to Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards in relation to five parliamentary questions and five debates.

Lord lester cut

Lords sound legal privilege alarm over snooping bill

29 June 2016By

Protections needed on the face of the investigatory powers bill, QCs tell the government. 

Email inbox

London firm reported to SRA after £17k email case settlement

29 June 2016By

Litigant had objected after personal emails were accessed by lawyers working on the other side.

Advertisement

Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession

Legal Services

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition