Antitrust watchdog to probe legal services

Topics: Law Society activity,Regulation and compliance

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (52)
  • Save

Related images

  • Victoria house

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is to examine ‘long-standing concerns about the affordability of legal services and standards of service’, it announced today.  

A market study restricted to England and Wales will examine:

  • Whether clients can drive effective competition by making informed purchasing decisions;
  • Whether clients are adequately protected from potential harm or can obtain satisfactory redress if legal services go wrong;
  • How regulation and the regulatory framework impact on competition for the supply of legal services.


The probe will not extend to criminal legal services, 'due to differences in the provision of such services – for example legal advice and representation are guaranteed for defendants in criminal proceedings'.

Rachel Merelie, senior director of delivery and sector regulation at the cartel watchdog, said: ‘We would be concerned if customers are not getting a good deal, either because they do not know what to expect when purchasing a legal service, or because they are not seeking appropriate legal support in the first place.

‘As well as carrying out our own research, we want to hear from all those involved about the issues they experience in using legal services and, in due course, how to tackle any problems we might identify.’

The CMA, based at Victoria House (pictured), London, said that recent surveys showed one in 10 users of legal services in England and Wales reported the overall service and advice provided was poor value for money. Just 13% said they viewed lawyers as cost-effective.

The watchdog will decide within six months whether it intends to refer the market for a more in-depth investigation, and a report must be published within 12 months setting out findings and actions it proposes to take.

As well as analysing existing research and gathering evidence from interested parties, the CMA will carry out surveys of consumers and small businesses and also plans to conduct a number of case studies into specific legal service areas.

The government has already announced its own consultation by spring 2016 on removing barriers to entry for alternative business models in legal services, and on making legal service regulators independent from their representative bodies.

In 2001, a review by the Office of Fair Trading, the CMA’s predecessor, found that many of the rules of the legal professions were ‘unduly restrictive, resulting in consumers receiving poorer value for money than they would have done under more competitive conditions’.

It recommended that rules governing the legal profession should be fully subject to competition law and that unjustified restrictions on competition should be removed.

That finding led to the Clementi review – and the Legal Services Act, which underpins the current regulatory structure.

Even though the CMA's remit extends to Scotland and Northern Ireland, the new investigation will be restricted to England and Wales, 'recognising that Scotland and Northern Ireland have different legal systems, and that regulatory reform is at a different stage in these jurisdictions'.

However, the watchdog said the outcome 'could inform any future consideration of similar issues in these countries'.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority welcomed today's announcement. Paul Philip, chief executive, said: ‘Over the past two years, our programme of regulatory reform has prioritised opening up the market and encouraging growth and innovation. We believe that will benefit both the public and the profession.

‘The government's proposals to make legal service regulators independent from their representative bodies would also strengthen the market and help make regulation more efficient and effective. Making this change would also cut costs, which will benefit solicitors and law firms and their clients, as well as boosting public confidence.’

Neil Buckley, chief executive of the Legal Services Board said the study ‘offers a clear opportunity to assess where the legal services market stands today. It offers an opening to understand better what should be done to unlock growth, increase productivity and address the significant unmet need that exits in this particularly important segment of the UK’s economy.’  

He said that the CMA’s decision reflects long-standing concerns about both the affordability and quality of legal services. 

‘A major problem in legal services is that a large proportion of the population and small businesses cannot afford such critical services. The functioning of the legal services market has without doubt improved since the introduction of the Legal Services Act but it still has a long way to go before it can be said that it is an effective market.’

Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon commented: ‘We know that the market for legal services is not fair as solicitors, who are heavily regulated, are having to compete with unregulated providers. Regulation is there to protect the public and we believe that for the market to work effectively regulation has to be applied equally to all providers.

‘This review is a good opportunity to reduce the regulatory burden on those solicitors who are having to compete with unregulated providers. Moving away from overly burdensome regulation, that does not service the public or meet business need, by placing greater reliance on solicitors taking responsibility for and driving their own professional standards is key. There is also an opportunity to ensure that the public and businesses are informed that if they do purchase from an unregulated provider they will get less protection.

‘Solicitors are trained, qualified, regulated, required to carry insurance and have professional standards. We will be contributing the views of solicitors, our research, our recent report on affordable legal services and our imminent Future of Legal Services report to inform the study.

‘Legal services provide a significant contribution to the UK economy. It is fundamental that competition across the provision of all legal services is fair if market confidence is to be maintained.’

Readers' comments (52)

  • Yet another Quango justifying its position in the food chain.

    Attack the Lawyers part...whatever number we are up to.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Oh, dear God, when will it ever end?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Pointless. Clients have massive choice when deciding who to instruct. What on earth has regulation got to do with choosing a lawyer?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What on earth have we all done in our past lives to deserve this living hell ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Maybe a good question for the CMA is why Solicitors are forced to pay fees to be a 'member' of The Law Society?

    Why can't we pay our dues over to the SRA for their regulatory work - and then make an informed choice on whether we wish to pay anything to the Law Society.

    I, for one, would choose not to pay a single penny for the good folk at 113 Chancery Lane...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's got to the point now where this is comedy.
    Just drop a nuclear bomb on the legal sector, be done with it and let the Insurance Industry continue to run the Country.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Marshall,

    Absolutely right! If contribution to the LS was discretionary, it might improve its performance.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I think that is a very fair and balanced picture of the CMA's offices. I think the Gazette should be congratulated on taking such a good picture.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I do not believe that 13% considered lawyers not to be value for money.It flies in the face of not only my firms CSQs but also those of all of the firms that I come across.I suggest that the Commitee visits some high street firms to see how they operate in practise and all the protections they provide to their clients before they make any recommendations.If regulations are relaxed or done away with clients will soon realise what they have lost and all the cowboy banks insurers and CMCs will make hay.Is anything being done to address their woeful client satisfation ratings?Do they really want us to act in the best interest of ouselves rather than the client because that is surely what will happen if they go down the route they suggest.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Anonymous 13 January 2016 - Absolutely right. But as the representative body for solicitors, what kind of defence of the public's right of access to "proper" legal services is being put up by the Law Society? What is the Law Society for ...I am seriously left wondering if they have any purpose other than providing this forum and perhaps keeping us up to date with the car crash of our profession. I have experienced trying to get the SRA to use their "regulatory" powers and have been totally unimpressed. The LS as it used to be was far more effective. Those who want to basically kill off the proper legal profession and substitute it with unqualified patsies who admittedly will probably be cheaper than a qualified and experienced lawyer (and won't present a threat to the authorities of course) are doing a tremendously efficient job (just a pity they can't be as efficient at other things isn't it?!!!) It's time for professionals (assuming we have a sufficient critical mass) to take action. Such a shame that only barristers have done this so far. What's the matter with solicitors? At the end of the day we may all need legal services ourselves you know...and I want to know that I can get a decent service. We all know what this "competition" nonsense is about...getting firms to employ more and more unqualified people who can pretend to a largely unsuspecting public that they are getting value for money and leave the insurers and politicians to "rule ok". We've allowed this situation to arise and only WE (while there are any of us left) need to do something about it. Legal Services wise we are perhaps already a third world country....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10per page20per page50per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (52)
  • Save
Browse over 4,300 law jobs Get jobs by email


Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession

Legal Services

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition