Claims firm collapses after crowdfunding £817k

Topics: Tax law,Litigation Funding

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (28)
  • Save

Related images

  • Exterior of 55-56 Lincoln's Inn Fields

A claims management company which raised £816,790 through a crowdfunding website has entered administration.

The Rebus Group, which specialises in acting for clients who had lost money in tax avoidance schemes, called in administrators on 28 January to handle its affairs.

Advertisement

The company had raised capital through the website CrowdCube.com and attracted 109 investors last year. The largest single investment was £135,000.

Rebus, which operated from an office (pictured) in Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, had pitched the business as seeking to ‘bring hope to ordinary investors who were misled into buying flawed complex financial solutions’. Founder Michael Kamine stated that the company had been operating for five years and had grown annual revenue to more than £1.2m.

It is believed to be the first time a firm associated with legal services has collapsed after asking the public to invest in return for a stake in the business.

In a statement, Crowdcube said it has informed members who invested in the business via email about how to help ‘minimise’ any capital losses.

‘Whilst the failure of any business is disappointing, not all businesses will succeed,’ it said. ‘The failure rate of crowdfunded business is around 6% compared to 50-70% of businesses that fail in the early years, according to the FCA.

‘The risks of investment are clear and highlight the importance of spreading investment risk with a diversified portfolio.

‘The failure of any business is regrettable; however, investors on Crowdcube can be assured that we are committed to ensuring transparency and have rigorous due diligence processes in place, which are spearheaded by an experienced team of legal and compliance professionals.’

A year ago, Rebus said it had grown from three staff members to a headcount of 29 full-time staff. It was managing more than 1,700 claims with a total value of more than £930m.

Simon Harris, of ReSolve Partners Limited, has been appointed as administrator. The firm has not yet responded to the Gazette's questions on what will happen to investors and ongoing claims.

Readers' comments (28)

  • anyone investing is such a scheme will get back exactly what they deserve.....................

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Can they sue the directors? If enough people send me £100,000 I'll have a go!!!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Looks like a possible case of throwing good money after bad

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Excellent excellent excellent news!

    Bring on Slater-them's insolvency.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @David Crawford10 February 2016 02:20 pm

    "..Can they sue the directors? If enough people send me £100,000 I'll have a go!!! .."

    Are you joking David? Where did your public spirit and interest go? I would be happy to stir up trouble by way of a no win no fee 'agreement', carefully ring fenced (as per Accident Exchange) so that the insurance policy never pays out, and in an off shore BVI umbrella control company as per the Insurers' and Banks' Legal Services Act 1998.

    Whats wrong with that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Seems to me, Raynor, that everyone is on the make and on the take. So I just thought I'd join in the fun...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • According to their website they have a 94% success rate (!!) - how did they fail?

    Sounds like a bunch of cowboys to me

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And David to the Claims Handling Society, tell them to get some balls like the British Medical Association, and try doing something else than grinning at the entrance of 113, and pretending to offer 'initiatives' in the Members room on Fridays to 'recruit' the next supposed 'disadvantaged' peculiarity.

    Thanks.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Where they went wrong is in not raising cash by selling £10,000 bonds to solicitors. Anyone want to know where I got that brainwave? Btw. how long before Sir Rupert's bonds become mandatory … ?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Another firm of ambulance chasers bites the dust. No loss there.
    But who on earth thought it was a good idea to invest in them?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10per page20per page50per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (28)
  • Save