Report comment

Of course, none relish the prospect of washing dirty laundry in public but consider equally the injustice that current confidentiality of family proceedings can cause, whatever the season:

One can be a DV victim, obtain court injunctive protection for self, & family, usually minors,but yet face contempt proceedings if one/one's lawyer discloses any information from those proceedings to an unauthorised third party without obtaining formal court approval first.

Am I wrong to anxiously consider the following scenario:

X clobbers Y.
Y seeks a nonmol injunction asa Y can stand but Y's Local Authority preempt Y & issue care proceedings the very next day, criticizing Y, for having allowed minors to be at risk of X's violence(routine grounds cited by LAs against DV victims, widely reported upon in press). As the non mol injunction expeditiously is granted in the only proceedings issued, the immediate but confidential care proceedings, the Order, & all case details, remain confidential to any but the few authorised parties;

X returns that night but this time,Y fights back & clobbers X ;
Y gets arrested, charged & detained as Y was armed with the kitchen sink, ready for X's return , desperate to show ability to protect minors and prompt return from care, & so strikes the fatal blow at X preemptively, as X climbs through the window, hollering blue murder at Y.
Y fully comments in police interview to explain, defend & avoid adverse inference, despite being a shaking mess.
Y, a DV victim, is fortunately eligible for Legal Aid & representation in both sets of proceedings-phew!
BUT neither Y nor Y's criminal lawyer, not even OIC nor CPS, can give,to the following day's public remand court , a detailed history, with reference to ongoing DV & family proceedings, unless they are ready to face contempt proceedings!

Sure, one can file a DCS but formal authority to disclose must be obtained first before trial , before any public hearing, including vital initial bail applications, unless fortuitously made in chambers.
Don't rely upon the OIC,CPS or Court to prompt you of the need for prior authority to disclose nor expect to get the authorised disclosure by the time of CPIA filing-most , it seems,like me,are unaware.
Instead, check out & remind all of Part B 2013 CC BenchBook Disclosure Protocol, in case it be overlooked!

"There's the remedy", you shout: do all before trial,on paper or in chambers & just hope a summary offence requiring immediate CMF does not apply.

BUT what about Y?
Maybe if Y could have told the local community, the neighbours, the neighbourhood watch,the local publican, the cornershop, of the existence & terms of the Court Order, Y may not ever have needed to cower alone, or at home, waiting...
"Unauthorised Others" could have called 999 on Y's behalf, upon first sighting of X within the exclusion zone.
After all, what's the point of a fully loaded, nonmol injunction with Power of Arrest if not yet served; if no one but you & the local Nick are aware of its existence; if only you, police or your process server can serve it or know of it's existence!

AND what about the criminal lawyer who doesn't practice care or family law, & can't be (is not authorized to be) told or shown, let alone pray in aid, any of that known at the Principal Registry or known by the Defendant & OIC!*!

My vote goes for a review of confidentiality in the Family Courts, ignorant criminal lawyer that I surely must be.

I know of one such case, although perhaps fortuitously, Y didn't clobber X.
Instead Y asked another in the immediate community not to facilitate X's breach of the NonMol Injunction & ended up in an argument instead, subsequently arrested for public order offences.
And so here we are:
-the mute, ignorant Defence Lawyer,
-Y, a DV victim,further victimised through prosecution,yet brave enough to inform,require & argue for effective protection from others as per the Court Order granted, aware of the La's watchful monitoring gaze,
-both, nay all, still awaiting correct CPIA scheduling & authority from PRFD to allow Y's defence to be heard.

Surely , the correct balance is not yet achieved.
Summertime or not ,Sir JM correctly identifies potential injustice.It is all too prevalent, you must surely agree?

And I'm sure you've heard the appropriate chant :
"I'm for Justice, are you?"