Report comment

Dru: The court system is there to resolve disputes and do justice between the parties. It is not there to provide the media with cheap and easy access.
It has been abundantly demonstrated that confidential proceedings frequently do not do justice, when the citizens who pay for the Court system occasionally get to hear of them, as Pamela notes: Of course, none relish the prospect of washing dirty laundry in public but consider equally the injustice that current confidentiality of family proceedings can cause, whatever the season. If Carlisle's belief is true, then it is an utter disgrace. How can this be objected to, if the parties, witnesses etc can, where necessary, be anonymized?